Report an error
NCAA Men's Skiing champion's points correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Visitors to SeaWorld California | r=0.92 | 15yrs | Yes! |
| The number of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators in Vermont | r=0.87 | 16yrs | No |
| Air quality in Crescent City, California | r=0.81 | 35yrs | Yes! |
| The distance between Uranus and Venus | r=0.61 | 48yrs | No |
| Runs scored by the New York Mets | r=0.55 | 48yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper' | r=-0.86 | 19yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'adopt a dog' | r=-0.88 | 19yrs | No |
NCAA Men's Skiing champion's points also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
